Friday, April 22, 2011

Why I Choose To Speak Out



Last week I had a facebook exchange with an old high school friend about why I feel the need to talk about religion so much. She accused me of being “a critic” and “hater” who is obsessed with “trying to convince Mormons that they are wrong.”

This exchange stung a little because I genuinely liked this person.  Also, there was some truth to the fact that I tend to talk, read, and write about religion a lot. (I guess I’m supposed to assume there is something wrong with that.) But I questioned her about how I was “a hater” - since I had done nothing to encourage hate. To her, however, I had criticized her religious beliefs. Sometimes believers identify so closely with their beliefs, that criticism can feel like a personal attack.

However, I am not criticizing religious believers. I’m only criticizing religious ideas. There is a difference, and believers need to stop acting like there isn’t. We live in a pluralistic society where we have freedom of speech and freedom of the press. We have the freedom to  criticize ideas from politics to economics.  Ben Franklin said of critics, “Critics are our friends. They tell us our faults.”  I have no problem with religious people criticizing my own ideas. I gladly invite their respectful criticism by having an open blog. But criticize their own religious beliefs, and they sometimes cry foul.

So with that as preamble, here are the reasons why I choose to speak out as a critic of religious ideas:

1.  I am justifying my new belief system to others. 

This is probably one of the main reasons we ex-Mormon/post-Mormons read and blog so much about why we left the church, but it is rarely admitted. However, there is nothing wrong with admitting it. I had good reasons for leaving the church. There is a mountain of historical, scientific, and logical evidence for concluding that the church is not what it claims to be, and is founded on pious lies and fanciful myths. We should justify these reasons with logical arguments and facts.

Mormons, including some friends and family who know me best, tended to assume certain things about me when I left: that I left the church because I was sinful, lazy, uncommitted, unreasonable, or unconverted. It’s understandable why Mormons, especially those who are closest to you, or who may be harboring doubts themselves, attack the messenger. It’s a cognitive defense mechanism and is taught to them by their scriptures and church authorities in order to protect religious belief. However, there is nothing wrong with speaking out and saying these sorts of ad hominem attacks are false and hateful. I know it’s hard for orthodox Mormons to imagine that people leave the church for good reasons, but it cannot be said too often that most people do.

2.  I am expressing my resentment of fundamentalist ideas, leaders, and institutions.

Nobody admits to being a fundamentalist, and fundamentalism clearly exists on a spectrum. Mormons are by no means extreme fundamentalists like their FLDS counterparts (who are a like a modern reincarnation of the LDS church during their theocratic and polygamist era of Nauvoo and 19th century Utah). However, most Mormons clearly believe that LDS scripture, as well as modern-day revelation through prophets, is somewhat inerrant and infallible, and universally authoritative. Religion is not just personal to the Mormon; it applies to everyone. This is one of the definitions of religious fundamentalism.

However, I disagree with the central dogmas of Mormon fundamentalism. I disagree with their leaders for perpetuating them. I disagree when lay members accept this spoon fed religious pablum. I want to counter these universal claims of truth because I think they are false and can be harmful to people both within the faith and people outside it as well. I want to try and prevent Mormons from inflicting their fundamentalist version of reality onto others. This would include those effected when Mormons try to legislate their theology onto nonbelievers (like California’s Prop 8, and other state measures banning gay marriage). It could also include religious indoctrination of children before they have the ability to reason for themselves. Children are sometimes saddled with an unrealistic view of truth by their well-intentioned religious parents and community, that can stifle the adherent personally and intellectually, and can be painful to shed once they discover the facts of history or science that are readily learned from books, the internet, or college courses.

In many ways, my speaking out about religion is similar to people telling others about a harmful product on the market: If you have been harmed in a business scam, or bought a product that was defective and falsely marketed, I think you have a duty to tell others. That is why we have the Better Business Bureau, Consumer Reports, and the FDA - to prevent bad or harmful products being on the market, to hold the manufacturers responsible for their product, and to encourage manufacturers to make better and safer products. I see the criticism of religious ideas similarly.

3.  I want to try and persuade fundamentalist Mormons to give up their unreasonable dogmatic cosmology, and accept a more rational one instead. 

I think that moderate and progressive religion can be a good thing for people and society. My issue is with fundamentalism.  If I can generate some rational thought and doubt in the minds of more fundamentalist Mormons - to the point where they don’t feel the need to apply their religious views on everyone else, including their own family members who are hurt by their ostracism and rejection - then I will have succeeded. Adopting a more rational attitude that “my religious beliefs apply only to me,” or adopting a “live-and-let-live” attitude about other’s religious views would be a step forward within Mormonism. It harms the religious believer in no way because they can still get the personal benefits from their religious views, but it prevents harm to those who they project their religious opinions onto.

4.  I want to offer support for other individuals who have similar doubts, or who are making similar journeys away from Mormonism.

The process of religious de-conversion can be an extremely painful and lonely process. I remember feeling very alone and scared during my own “faith crisis.” Listen to French philosopher Jeoffroy as he describes the emotional pain he experienced following his loss of faith in Catholicism:

“This moment was a frightful one; and when towards morning I threw myself exhausted on my bed, I seemed to feel my earlier life, so smiling and so full, go out like a fire, and before me another life opened, sombre and unpeopled, where in future I must live alone, alone with my fatal thought which had exiled me thither, and which I was tempted to curse. The days which followed this discovery were the saddest of my life.”

And here is author Alan Mintz in his book Banished from Their Father’s Table, describing Orthodox Jewish students sense of loss from their religious community when they concluded that Orthodox Judaism was not tenable:

“It was not so much that they world of faith had been purposely rejected but that at a certain point its plausibility had simply collapsed. . . . The world that had once been thick with symbols and texts, sacred times and covenanted obligations, providential signs and redemptive promises was, suddenly, not there. . .  This intellectual and metaphysical negation was deepened by the loneliness that resulted from the break with family and community.” 

I felt this way for a time too. For a time I perceived my journey in negative terms, rather than positive ones, because that is how my fundamentalist community framed the issue for me. I was taught to fear the intellectual exploration of religious doubts because it could lead to so much loss. According to LDS teachings, if you lose your faith, you can lose it all.

However, in our journey of faith, there can be much to gain as well; a light at the end of the tunnel; a mountain peak view at the end of an arduous climb; enlightenment where before there was only doubt and guilt. Not all is lost when losing one’s faith. Much is gained in terms of personal growth, intellectual honesty, personal integrity, and a more realistic (and very humbling) view of our place in the universe. The natural universe we occupy, as well as the social and emotional world our mind operates in, is even more full of rewards, wonder and awe than we could previously imagine. But, along the way, we sometimes have to give up cherished ideas and beliefs that may be holding us back.

This is why I choose to speak out.

10 comments:

  1. I couldn't have said it better myself....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Josh,

    I've read a number of your posts this afternoon and am really enjoying your insights. I am what might best be described as a NOM, but it's a title I'm not terribly comfortable with. The reality is that I'm currently in a state of limbo; no longer believing in the foundational tenets of Mormonism, but with children and a TBM wife, finding it difficult to take the next step. There's much more I could share, and just might in time, but for now I wanted to thank you for your blog. I've noticed that on many of your excellent posts, there is not a single comment. Please don't let this discourage you. I'm certain that there are many like me who read and enjoy your insights, but simply do not express this in the form of comments. Perhaps you already have a sense of this via Google analytics or the like. In any event, thank you, and keep up the great work.

    -Brian

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think your premise that "there is a difference between the believer and the belief (i.e. the person and their idea)" is faulty. It is faulty only in perception, because, as you point out, not everyone can see it. So if you know that going in, how can you really expect them to engage you the way you want to be engaged? It's just not a fair discussion.

    1. Why do you have to justify your new belief system to others? First of all, I'm impressed that you call it a belief system. That is cool. But screw them. You're not going to get validation from them. For me at least, I have had to give this up. I don't care if they accept my beleifs or not -- you know? i don;t need their validation. And neither do you.

    2. Expressing resentment. I hear you. Being a thorn in the side. But it's almost more about being a missionary for your new belief system, isn't it? but at the same time, still feeling the desire to subvert the smarmy arrogance you know they feel because you used to feel it, too. I can totally relate to that at least.

    3. Maybe this one is more the missionary effort -- come unto good for the sake of good.

    4. Oh come on, now you're jsut trying to sound all altruistic saving the best for last -- but who are you kidding, hater? You just really want to sin and piss people off -- you already admitted it! (just kidding)

    Nice post Josh. I enjoyed it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks Brian for your very kind comment. It is encouraging. I'd love to hear more of your own journey when you get the chance. Limbo land can be a lonely and difficult place to be in. Hang in there. It does get better.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My Man Glenn! Thanks for dropping by from Abraham's bosom. It's nice in the telestial realm too. I felt nothing but love from your comment and hear what you are saying. Thanks for saying it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. >>>Much is gained in terms of personal growth, intellectual honesty, personal integrity, and a more realistic (and very humbling) view of our place in the universe.<<<

    Excellent post! Thank you for clarifying my own thoughts and feelings. There's a big world out there... I like how you remind us to look up. And I appreciate your words that it's okay to blog to sort through feelings about time spent in the LDS church. 11 years after leaving I find I still "have days", they are fewer and fewer, but still happen.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Glen, Might I differ in opinion on your #1 response? RE: Validation, yes, I can get on board with that, but having to justify your belief to others? Yes, I think so. Perhaps I am being too liberal with the word justify, and I really mean argue/defend/provoke etc... We live in a marketplace of ideas where the best ones should be the last ones standing. The argument for the authenticity of the church is out there, it's fair game, just like any other national organization that is espousing theologically specific morals, politicizing theological agendas, making specific testable claims about archeology, anthropology, and the habitability of celestial satellites. These are ideas that we cannot allow to go unchallenged, that's how bad theological ideas of the past (e.g. Slavery) were discarded, through the hammer-blows of modernity.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I identify with almost all of your points (or maybe all of them), but I said “identify,” which may infer ‘agreement with,’ but I am not sure if I do with all of them. You said:

    “In many ways, my speaking out about religion is similar to people telling others about a harmful product on the market: If you have been harmed in a business scam, or bought a product that was defective and falsely marketed, I think you have a duty to tell others. That is why we have the Better Business Bureau, Consumer Reports, and the FDA - to prevent bad or harmful products being on the market, to hold the manufacturers responsible for their product, and to encourage manufacturers to make better and safer products. I see the criticism of religious ideas similarly.”

    I initially thought this was a valid and cogent rationale for speaking out, but after a bit of thought I’m not so sure that Mormon, religious beliefs are the same as harmful, tangible, market-place products. I don’t think there is anything overtly harmful with anything the Mormon church teaches that necessitates public outcry or even mild public denouncement. Sure, for a lot of people the LDS church’s position on Prop 8 would seem to illicit the need for public disdain, but does it really? Doesn’t the church have the obligation to speak out against and stand up to legislation that it believes is harmful to the moral fabric of our society? It’s a church! That’s what churches do. And you must admit that there was a lot more venom spewed against the LDS church than any other church (or segment of our society) that felt the same way as the LDS church. We can discuss and agree/disagree about this particular point as for why, but no one can deny that the LDS church did take most of the flack. But again, it’s a church; that’s what churches do. If you don’t agree with the church’s position then vote contrary to it and campaign for your own side, but to display public animosity towards a ‘church’ and denounce it because it differs from your beliefs isn’t right.

    I don’t want to cherry pick phrases from your post and use them to advance my own stance, but you did say, “in our journey of faith.” Isn’t any religion a lot about faith, even if that religion purports to the “one, true church”? A lot of churches (aka: religions) purport that! Who cares? It’s religion. It’s not something that you need to *purchase* like you do a baby car seat, or crib, which for these *products* when you find out are defective and pose a real safety risk you just turn a blind eye. Religion is not the same as a baby car seat whether defective, or in perfect working order. It’s religion; it’s a *belief* system. You don’t need it to pay your mortgage or put food on the table (even if the religion says by paying tithes, it will!). If you don’t believe in it anymore, let it go and move on. Otherwise, the only reason I can think of right now for not letting it go is when after turning your back on it you have some residual, lingering beliefs that it still *could* be “the one true” religion notwithstanding all of the supposed red flags. This may be the cause for some sort of reverse cognitive dissonance that may give rise to overt, public denouncements. These denouncements may be a psychological defense mechanism of the ego to justify your reason(s) for abandoning a faith you may not be *completely* convinced is a fraud.

    Just my thoughts.

    Peace.

    edited for formatting errors

    ReplyDelete
  10. Josh,

    This part of your post is exactly what has been going through my head as I made my final decision to leave the church:

    "It could also include religious indoctrination of children before they have the ability to reason for themselves. Children are sometimes saddled with an unrealistic view of truth by their well-intentioned religious parents and community, that can stifle the adherent personally and intellectually, and can be painful to shed once they discover the facts of history or science that are readily learned from books, the internet, or college courses."

    I don't want my children going through what I'm going through right now. I am trying to recover from the pain of "discovering the facts of history or science" of which I was "indoctrinated into before I had the ability to reason for myself."

    There are people that may give you a hard time for putting your reasons for leaving the church out there for others to see, but I thank you and empathize with you completely. What you are doing is helping people like me see we're not alone. That we're not disillusioned or "captured by Satan" like we have been taught all our lives to believe if we have questions, doubt or leave the church.

    Thanks again.

    ReplyDelete